Hmm, InfinityWard made a massive step forward to come even with DICE. Their new game, Call of Duty: Ghosts, is with it's new engine a better looking game. The trailer somehow gives me goosebumps.. The time when I was addicted to Call of Duty is over, but this reminds me of the game it supposed to be. An award winning game with loads of good gameplay.
Just for the record, I played Modern Warfare 1 and 2.
Back to Call of Duty: Ghosts. One thing for sure, InfinityWard have made bigger improvements with Ghosts, than DICE did with BF4. Here's the trailer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zxnx3W-HA18
Tell me what you guys think of it. I'll appreciate it. :-)
juress
Theme Developer
If "new engine" means "new generation od the same fucking engine they've been using for 10 years (quake 3 engine), then yea, I guess.
One thing I like about CoD:G - LEAN!
FFs COD is an arcade game and they added this tactical feature. Why can't DICE implement it?
Anyways - graphic on BC2-BF3 level, nothing new.
xXJumpyXx
Helping Hand
Pre-rendered trailers are always nice looking. But without actual game play being shown, nothing is known for sure.
I guess we'll have to wait for E3.
Pun1a
Helping Hand
Everyone thought that after MW2, Black ops will have got such great graphics. After black ops, though much people thought hat MW3 will have >> the << new great graphics experience. And this repeated again and again 'til black ops 2.
One thing for sure, InfinityWard have made bigger improvements with Ghosts, than DICE did with BF4.
Wow, it's so hard to improve Black Ops 2 with his great graphix.
Anyway, at the Xbox one event, Activision talked about "dynamic experiences". Huh, sounds like Frostbite destruction? I remember that they've said at the release of MW3 or BO2, that destruction doesn't work with the "typical" gameplay of CoD. Fuckin copycats. They realized that battlefield took CoD doggy.
Dendari
Translator
I'll wait some gameplay video. It didn't surprise me too much, especially the character models (BF4 wins hands down). The lean feature is nothing new (see Call of Duty 1, UO, 2, 4).
juress
Theme Developer
Dendari wrote:
I'll wait some gameplay video. It didn't surprise me too much, especially the character models (BF4 wins hands down). The lean feature is nothing new (see Call of Duty 1, UO, 2, 4).
Exactly - and it was awesome...
Topicstarter
Meaurk
Global Moderator
Their lightning effects are absolutely awesome, even better than Battlefield!
http://i.imgur.com/QpG784w.jpg
José Ortega
Global Moderator
My sarcasm radar seems to not work in this case, i dont know what to think Meaurk.
Somebody will buy this game?
For me it's 50/50 - Dedicated Server is the main reason why i don't like the prev. titles.
SP was cool everytime, but MP was a piece of crap because of the horrible server/hosts finding thingy.
juress
Theme Developer
BrainFooLong wrote:
Somebody will buy this game?
For me it's 50/50 - Dedicated Server is the main reason why i don't like the prev. titles.
SP was cool everytime, but MP was a piece of crap because of the horrible server/hosts finding thingy.
Free dedicated server soft is the only thing CoD series did right, anyone can host a server. With BF you actually need to pay monthly, which for me is retarded and I'm astonished that there are actual people that are willing to pay fees monthly from their own pockets to host a server, srsly...
Server finding thingy? Whats battlelog then? What about preBF3? Same thing.
Post edited 1 x times, last by
BrainFooLong
Administrator
BrainFooLong
Administrator
I don't mean with "server host" thingy the server browser list in BF or the server list in COD.
But in the last COD's you didn't had any of that. You just get randomly assigned to a match, the is hosted by a user itself (anyone is randomly the host). You don't have the choice on which "host" you can join.
That i mean with the crap system.
Dedicated server that a player can open/host is the best what a multiplayer can have. That was the best in the "old school" shooters. Now everybody try to make money from the cow (the community).
Now is COD Ghosts it seems like that Dedicated Server come back.
juress
Theme Developer
That was the IWnet thing and yes, that wasn't so cool.
Post edited 5 x times, last by
José Ortega
Global Moderator
José Ortega
Global Moderator
Buy? i dont think so, well, i won't buy BF4 neither due to actual rig limitations (it's not much enjoyable in my machine but it's barely playable.), in fact, i feel like this:
http://i.imgur.com/hSC6wCF.gif
If for some reason someone gifts COD to me i will play it, I don't care if it's worst than BF4, i'm pretty sure my rig will be capable of handle this, and that's more than enough for me to play it, also if i can create a server like in other games (with a software) i may use the dedicated remote server i have access to
only
host scrims and play without lag.
the dedicated server is part of the game server our clan sponsor has, if not, i would donate it for BBLog stuff. Only I and our sponsor have access to it due to the fact i do some work for them, maybe i'll get some pay in the future, not much, but for me every penny is worth it. :D.
http://www.speedtest.net/result/3051013538.png
GameFreakBoy
wasakakero wrote:
http://www.speedtest.net/result/3051013538.png
Is that the server's connection, or is that on your personal machine.?
José Ortega
Global Moderator
GameFreakBoy wrote:
wasakakero wrote:
http://www.speedtest.net/result/3051013538.png
Is that the server's connection, or is that on your personal machine.?
server's, i don't have money to have a decent PC much less a 1Gbps home connection (and I dont think Venezuela has something like that...)